GENESIS puts a team of AI specialists to work on a one-person business, every day, inside limits the owner sets. Every action is scored before it runs, signed after it runs, and can be undone. Nobody else in this market can prove what their AI did. We can.
● PRE-REVENUE · BILLING LIVE · RAISING £500K SEIS/EIS · EVERY NUMBER IN THIS DECK IS READ LIVE FROM THE PLATFORM'S OWN RECORDS
Good morning. My name is Samuel Deangelo. I run four businesses, and for years I did every job in them: the marketing, the sales, the books, the admin, the content.
So I built the team I could never afford. A set of AI specialists that plan the week, do the work, and stop to ask when it matters. Israel Olumide Isiavwe, my co-founder and COO, comes from the financial sector and has run one of those businesses alongside me; he owns the commercial side, compliance and this raise.
It is live. It bills. Our own companies run on it today. And it does one thing nobody else in this market does: it signs a record of everything the team did, so a customer, an auditor or an insurer can check it without trusting us.
We are asking for £500,000 under SEIS and EIS. It buys eighteen months and the distribution the product needs to win its first 400 paying customers.
Here is what it does, what it costs to win a customer, and what could go wrong.
There are 32 million businesses in the UK and the US with no employees at all. Every one of them is run by someone doing six jobs, most of them badly, because they cannot afford the person who would do them well.
A decent marketer, salesperson or bookkeeper is £6,000 to £9,000 a month. The owner earns less than that. So the jobs get done at midnight, or not at all.
Today's AI tools will act in your name with no limits, no record and no way back. It is your brand, your card and your legal liability. So you end up babysitting the thing that was meant to give you your evenings back.
Ask any AI platform to prove what its agents did last Tuesday. Silence. Fine for a hobby. A deal-breaker the moment real money, real customers or a regulator is involved.
How much it may spend, what it must never touch, how much freedom it gets. Cautious, Balanced or Autopilot. You can change it any morning.
One plans the week. The others write, build and run the website, research leads, draft the emails you approve, chase the invoices, post to your channels and cost your ads.
What the team did, what came in, what needs you. Approve with one click. Anything they did can be undone for 24 to 48 hours.
Every action gets a score from 0 to 100 before it runs. Is it technically sound? Is it worth the money? Is it appropriate? Could it embarrass the owner? The score decides whether it goes, goes and tells you, or waits for you.
ON THE FREE PLAN EVERY ACTION WAITS. ON AUTOPILOT EVERYTHING INSIDE THE LIMITS RUNS. THE THREE ABOVE WAIT ON EVERY PLAN, HOWEVER SURE THE TEAM IS.
Every action is written to a record that cannot be altered afterwards. Once a day an independent timestamp authority stamps that record. Even we could not quietly rewrite last week. A customer hands the signed export to a client, an auditor or an insurer, who checks it on their own machine against a key we publish. We are not in that conversation. That is the point.
Two years of signed history does not move to a competitor who never kept one. Leaving means starting the record again from nothing.
They can build agents. They cannot be the independent record of what their own agents did. An auditor cannot audit itself. We sit on the buyer's side and use whichever model is best that year.
Proof of good behaviour is becoming a purchasing question, from insurers to the EU AI Act. Our customers' evidence has been building since the day they signed up.
Those companies are ours and our test accounts. This is not evidence of demand; demand is what the raise pays for. What it does show is a platform that runs unattended and behaves when something goes wrong. In August the model account ran out of credit for seven days. It published nothing half-finished, emailed us every day, and the record stayed intact throughout.
Each quarter the best models get cheaper and closer to one another. A company built on raw capability alone stopped being defensible some time in 2025.
Agents can now find each other and pay each other. Finding one will be easy. Knowing which one to trust with money will not.
The EU AI Act and ISO 42001 are turning "show me your governance" into something procurement asks for. We answer it with a signed record, not a policy document.
Hosting and model costs are small. Salaries are the burn. Customers who run hot buy top-ups at £15 per thousand actions.
Each customer's AI spend is capped at half of what they pay us. Worst case is a 50% gross margin. Measured on the live platform it is 82 to 88%. The model uses 70% to stay conservative.
Every price on the pricing page is read from the same file the billing system charges from. Annual is twelve months for the price of ten.
After that, every month is margin. At 3% monthly churn the average customer stays about 33 months, which is roughly six times what it cost to win them, at the conservative margin.
ASSUMPTIONS ARE LABELLED AS ASSUMPTIONS. MARGIN IS MEASURED. THE CAP ON AI SPEND IS CODE, NOT A SPREADSHEET.
From about $8bn in 2025, growing 41 to 46% a year. We are in the working-agents part of that, not the chatbots.
32 million businesses with no employees. Take only the 10% already paying for software: 3.2 million buyers at £1,320 a year, which is our own price ladder.
Annual run-rate from 5,000 paying companies. That is 0.16% of the segment, from subscriptions alone, before the share.
SOURCES: MARKETSANDMARKETS (AUG 2026) · BCC RESEARCH · TBRC · UK DBT BUSINESS POPULATION ESTIMATES · US CENSUS NONEMPLOYER STATISTICS
A company run by AI, narrating its own signed record every day, is content nobody else can make. An owned channel, so the cost per customer falls over time.
Indie Hackers, UK accelerator alumni, agency and solo-founder networks. Referrals and partnerships rather than ads. Our own businesses are the case studies.
Our own outreach agent, every first message approved by a human and inside UK cold-email rules, aimed at the 4.1 million UK businesses with no staff.
£175K OF THE RAISE BUYS ROUGHLY 440 CUSTOMERS AT £400 EACH · THE MONTH-12 CHECKPOINT IS 400 PAYING COMPANIES
Polsia, Wix Symphony and others. They act, and they do not sign. Where a revenue share exists it lands on ad spend and the customer cannot check it.
Vanta, Drata, OneTrust. They audit companies. They do not run one, and they sell to enterprises, not to a founder with no staff.
Credo, Holistic. They police enterprise agents. They do not do the work.
Does the work. Keeps a signed record. Is paid on verified results. Sold to the one buyer the giants ignore: the person running a business alone.
WHAT THEY HAVE THAT WE DON'T: BRAND, MONEY AND DISTRIBUTION. THAT IS WHAT THIS ROUND BUYS.
| Month 12 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paying companies | 400 | 1,500 | 5,000 |
| Revenue per customer / month | £110 | £110 | £110 |
| Annual run-rate | £0.53m | £2.0m | £6.6m |
| Gross margin, modelled conservatively | ~70% | ~70% | ~72% |
| People | 3 | 7 | 14 |
| Net burn / month | ~£28k | covered by revenue | cash generative |
The assumptions: £400 to win a customer, 8% of free users converting, 5.2 months to pay that back, 3% monthly churn. The margin floor is not an assumption; the code caps each customer's AI budget at half their subscription. Three customers cover the infrastructure. The £28k a month is people. The runway ends with four months in hand.
Email, invoice chasing, the owner's channel and a daily outreach cadence work today. Posting to X, Facebook and Instagram is built and goes live the moment the platform apps are keyed. LinkedIn waits on its API approval. Paperwork the money pays for, not new science.
August was the test. Credits ran out, and the platform held customer work rather than shipping rubbish. A second provider is wired in and models can be switched. Automatic top-ups are being switched on.
I wrote the entire platform and I still ship it. Everything technical passes through one pair of hands. The mitigations: a written operating runbook, a second full-time founder who now covers commercial, compliance and the raise, and a platform that ran unattended for a week and behaved. A real risk, and I will not pretend otherwise.
Well-funded products sell AI help to small businesses and will keep improving. None signs the record, none is paid on verified results, none is built for a UK solo founder's compliance. That is the ground we hold, and it is narrower than it was in May. We say so.
I run four businesses of my own: a trading education company I co-founded with Israel, a market-intelligence product, a regulated motor-finance introducer and an AI training academy. I wanted to hand parts of them to AI and could not, because nothing would show me what it had actually done with my name on it. So I built the thing that would, and put my own companies on it first.
Product, engineering and the build-in-public channel. I wrote the platform and I ship it. My own businesses are its first customers and its testing ground.
Financial-sector background, full time on GENESIS. Owns commercial, compliance, finance and the raise. Co-founder of Pleuro Markets and its Market Breakers Course.
The platform runs and documents itself through its own agents, under our veto, with the signed record to prove it. One of us writes the code; the other runs the company around it. That is why two people can.
A growth lead is now the first hire, then an operations second-in-command, both within three months of closing. Both costed in the model.
Why this pairing: our wedge is agent behaviour that can be audited and verified. Israel has lived inside audit trails and regulated process; I have lived inside the code. We already run Pleuro Markets and its Market Breakers Course together. The record has to satisfy both of us before it satisfies anyone else.
Structure: £250k SEIS (the lifetime cap) issued first, then £250k EIS. Pre-money: £2.0m. £500k buys 20%; post-money £2.5m. Same share price across the SEIS and EIS tranches. Advance assurance: applied, awaiting HMRC.
DILIGENCE IS SELF-SERVED: EVERY NUMBER HERE CHECKS AGAINST /compliance/platform-metrics, SEALED AND VERIFIABLE OFFLINE · founder@genesishq.net